> On Nov 4, 2015, at 7:57 AM, Schalk Cronjé <ysb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > A post of the other day made me think about this (Russel's to blame as > usual). What is the correct to referring to Groovy in documentation now? > > Is it Groovy or is it Apache Groovy? > > OR > > Is it Groovy for releases prior to 2.4 and Apache Groovy for 2.4 and beyond? > > -- > Schalk W. Cronjé > Twitter / Ello / Toeter : @ysb33r >
Branding policy: http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs.html. This is in place, of course, to make sure that the PMC remains in control of the product, and nobody can become confused by somebody else calling their version “ZeCo Groovy” or similar. Documentation, I think should pretty much follow the “Website” guidelines, so in brief, there should be a prominent mention of “Apache Groovy”, but referring to it as just “Groovy” in other places in the page is fine. Cheers, Greg Trasuk.
