Hi Ralph,

Had to fire up Groovy Console (2.4.5) and try it out:

class Obj {
   Map foo
}

obj = new Obj()

obj.foo?.fee = 'some value'

assert obj.foo?.fee == null

I do not see an error, so unless I misunderstand your problem, I do not think 
it's wrong. 

To verify, I did the same with Groovy 2.1.9, same result. Then with Groovy 
1.8.9, just to be sure, also same result. 

PS: Just got to love sdkman.io when testing such code....

Best regards / Med venlig hilsen,
Søren Berg Glasius

Hedevej 1, Gl. Rye, 8680 Ry, Denmark
Mobile: +45 40 44 91 88, Skype: sbglasius
--- Press ESC once to quit - twice to save the changes.

On November 17, 2015 at 8:04:55 PM, Ralph Johnson (john...@cs.uiuc.edu) wrote:

I am in the process of converting a large Groovy program from 2.1 to 2.4.   A 
year or two ago I converted it from (I think) 1.8 to 2.1.

I found an odd assignment.

obj.foo?.fee = v

The code assumed that if obj.foo was null, this assignment statement was 
skipped.   It does not work that way in 2.4, and I had to rewrite it to make 
the code work.  I had no idea that you could use the safe dereferencing 
operator on the left-hand-side of an assignment, I always thought it was only 
on the right-hand-side.   I imagine that the author of this code was exploiting 
a bug in Groovy, that Groovy was never supposed to allow this.   Somewhere 
between 2.1 and 2.4, this bug got fixed.    Or was there a change in the 
definition of Groovy?   Or am I completely missing the point?

-Ralph Johnson

Reply via email to