Hi!

Thanks so much for your quick and elaborate answer!

We will have a lock at the docker variant in the future for sure.

And we really DO want to use projects and environments, but using the “correct” 
and recommended, best-practice way, and for the moment without using containers.

Perhaps our use-cases itself is non-standard, but in our case, we are a couple 
of developers working on a couple of ETL projects that are versionized in a 
couple of git repositories, and have to execute/test them on a couple of 
different servers with different OS versions, different DB versions etc.

When, say, developer A checks out project B, copies/stores it onto server C in 
some folder D and wants to execute it from there with as little effort/overhead 
as possible, we search for the best-practice on how to get the Apache hop 
project to work.
In the ideal case without having to execute the command line commands for 
project/environment creation and so on, but if that’s the best-practice to do 
so we are fine also.
If on the other hand using some single (already pre-existing) “default” project 
and modify the ${PROJECT_HOME} via “project-modify” switch was the best way for 
this special kind of use case, we would simply stick to our current approach 
with temporary projects, and then, when the bug gets fixed, switch over.

Thanks lot for any potential further ideas/suggestions in advance.
Best regards,

Gerhard

Von: Bart Maertens <[email protected]>
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 1. März 2023 20:09
An: [email protected]
Betreff: [EXTERN]Re: Excecution of Hop workflows on a Linux server via command 
line

Hi Gerhard,

Projects and environments were introduced because of the lack of flexibility 
when working with multiple projects, in multiple environments.
Many people and organizations started using their own scripts to circumvent 
those limitations and juggling with multiple kettle.properties files that were 
copied, parsed/populated from templates, etc.
Apache Hop aims to provide a more unified and flexible way to deal with that.

Your initial approach, modifying the project home for the default project, 
revealed a bug[1], (thanks for reporting it). Once that's fixed, that could be 
a possible approach. Maybe not the best one, but at least it should work.

An alternative approach that could make your life a lot easier is to run your 
workflows and pipelines through docker[2].
Running a pipeline or workflow in the short-lived container would come down to 
more or less a hybrid version of the two approaches you describe: you could 
mount _any_ folder on your server's file system as the project folder, and add 
the necessary environment files.
All of the hop-conf and hop-run commands will be taken care of by the container.

If you really, really, really don't want to use projects and environments, you 
can just remove the projects plugin from hop/plugins/misc/projects.
You'll need to find another way to provide environment-specific configurations 
in that case, through variables, parameters, system properties ...

Let us know if any of these approaches work for you or if there's anything else 
we can do to help.

[1] 
https://github.com/apache/hop/issues/2494<https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Fhop%2Fissues%2F2494&data=05%7C01%7Cgmitterlechner%40eurofunk.com%7C4926be3c48a54a9fc44808db1a8872e4%7C6d4fa94918de4214a28c3e8c7fa9c25b%7C0%7C0%7C638132945565032449%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=QA%2BYZzwvRdgDbOtqooC1LF9QvL5uh3NWCGkwPSALu5s%3D&reserved=0>
[2] 
https://hop.apache.org/tech-manual/latest/docker-container.html#_how_to_run_the_container<https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fhop.apache.org%2Ftech-manual%2Flatest%2Fdocker-container.html%23_how_to_run_the_container&data=05%7C01%7Cgmitterlechner%40eurofunk.com%7C4926be3c48a54a9fc44808db1a8872e4%7C6d4fa94918de4214a28c3e8c7fa9c25b%7C0%7C0%7C638132945565032449%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=vjH1TwCpPXbLeUwu1jofUCTaP4QYtZbsuFqeWMf%2F4Tg%3D&reserved=0>

Regards,
Bart


On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 8:57 AM MITTERLECHNER Gerhard 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi!

When trying to migrate our PDI/Spoon projects over to Apache Hop the following 
issue occurred, where the documentation does not give us sufficient information.

In PDI/Spoon we simple used bash-scripts to start “kitchen.sh” referencing the 
main kjb-job of the ETL project (note, we are using GUI-less Linux servers).

The typical workflow is:

  *   We develop using Spoon (or Apache Hop) on our Windows developer machines, 
and push the project to a git repos.
  *   We then clone (or copy) the git repos a projects into an arbitrary 
directory on the Linux server and start the project with “kitchen.sh”
from there (in fact, we use a wrapper shellscript similar to the one below that 
calls “kitchen.sh”).

Trying to do the same seems with Hop makes a little more problems:

  *   a project is needed
  *   a environment is needed for reading in the env.-config file(s) containing 
environment variables
  *   so the script (see below, is stored as part of every project with 
different variable values) that calls “hop-run.sh” now also uses “hop-conf.sh”

     *   to (delete and) create an environment
     *   to (delete and) create a temporary project in the current file 
location that is deleted again when the ETL is finished

  *   We find this procedure clumsy and is probably not the recommended 
procedure for such a use case.

NOTE: We do not want to have to pre-define/pre-create all potential Hop 
projects for all potential file locations on the Linux server, as we are having 
many projects, and want to keep the flexibility to run them inside arbitrary 
file locations on the server.


#!/bin/bash

WORKFLOW_TO_START=test_workflow.hwf

# removes the last 4 characters:

HOP_HWF=${WORKFLOW_TO_START%????}



CURRENT_FOLDER=$(pwd)

TIMESTAMP=$(date +"%Y%m%d_%H%M%S")

CURRENT_LOGFILE=${HOP_HWF}_${TIMESTAMP}.log



HOP_PATH=/home/pentaho/hop/apache-hop-client-2.3.0/hop

PROJECT_PATH=$(pwd)

PROJECT_NAME=$(basename $(pwd))

ENV_NAME=test-env

ENV_PURPOSE=Development

ENV_CONF_FILE=env-var.json

RUN_CONFIG=local

DEBUG_LEVEL=BASIC



sh ${HOP_PATH}/hop-conf.sh --project-delete --project ${PROJECT_NAME} > 
/dev/null 2>&1

sh ${HOP_PATH}/hop-conf.sh --project-create --project ${PROJECT_NAME} 
--project-home=${PROJECT_PATH}



sh ${HOP_PATH}/hop-conf.sh --environment-delete --environment ${ENV_NAME} > 
/dev/null 2>&1

sh ${HOP_PATH}/hop-conf.sh --environment-create --environment ${ENV_NAME} 
--environment-project ${PROJECT_NAME} --environment-purpose=${ENV_PURPOSE} 
--environment-config-files=${PROJECT_PATH}/${ENV_CONF_FILE}



sh ${HOP_PATH}/hop-run.sh --project ${PROJECT_NAME} --file ${WORKFLOW_TO_START} 
--runconfig=${RUN_CONFIG} --environment=${ENV_NAME} --level=${DEBUG_LEVEL} >> 
$CURRENT_LOGFILE 2>&1 &



sh ${HOP_PATH}/hop-conf.sh --project-delete --project ${PROJECT_NAME} > 
/dev/null 2>&1



mkdir -p $CURRENT_FOLDER/logs

mv $CURRENT_LOGFILE logs


We cannot imagine that this is the way we should continue. What would be the 
recommended way?



Side note:
Our first approach was to use the already existing “samples” or “default” 
project on the server, and simply re-direct its ${PROJECT_HOME} to the file 
location where ETL-project we currently want to start is stored.
So we tried to manipulate the variable using “project-modify” switch:
sh /home/pentaho/hop/apache-hop-client-2.3.0/hop/hop-conf.sh --project-modify 
--project default --project-home=/home/pentaho/hop/testhoprun/
This indeed gives the message that the project-home variable would have been 
updated successfully:

Project configuration for 'default' was modified in 
/home/pentaho/hop/apache-hop-client-2.3.0/hop/config/hop-config.json
BUT looking at hop-config.json we see that nothing has changed, the 
project-home variable is still pointing to the original location of the default 
project.
(And the workflow stored in the testhoprun location cannot be executed 
succesfully, of course.)

This is independent of trying to manipulate ${PROJECT_HOME} of the “default”, 
“sample” or any other existing project.

Is this a bug?
(Tested on Hop 2.3).


Mit freundlichen Grüßen

Gerhard Mitterlechner
Senior Development Engineer
Database Management

[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
________________________________

[eurofunk Kappacher Logo]

eurofunk KAPPACHER GmbH
eurofunk-Straße 1 − 8, 5600 St. Johann im Pongau, Österreich / Austria

Board of Management: Christian Kappacher, Dr. Christian Kappacher
VAT No.: ATU35454003 | Registered in: FN 52582 b, LG Salzburg
________________________________
Products  |  Solutions  |  Service       
www.eurofunk.com<http://www.eurofunk.com/>

[https://servicedesk.eurofunk.com/helplinePortal/content/images/eurofunk_facebook.png]<https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2FeurofunkKappacher%2F&data=05%7C01%7Cgmitterlechner%40eurofunk.com%7C4926be3c48a54a9fc44808db1a8872e4%7C6d4fa94918de4214a28c3e8c7fa9c25b%7C0%7C0%7C638132945565032449%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=TKwDPhoadIaXRDx48Ex%2BM7dWbHURAvfgr9ivGjRZlf0%3D&reserved=0>
  
[https://servicedesk.eurofunk.com/helplinePortal/content/images/eurofunk_linkedin.png]
 
<https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fcompany%2F5039801%2F&data=05%7C01%7Cgmitterlechner%40eurofunk.com%7C4926be3c48a54a9fc44808db1a8872e4%7C6d4fa94918de4214a28c3e8c7fa9c25b%7C0%7C0%7C638132945565032449%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=PvXG1tc4uLoVZqLCHqyTXbTdeQyST8f3ZmEHd6AlIw4%3D&reserved=0>
   
[https://servicedesk.eurofunk.com/helplinePortal/content/images/eurofunk_youtube.png]
 
<https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fuser%2Feurofunkkappacher%2F&data=05%7C01%7Cgmitterlechner%40eurofunk.com%7C4926be3c48a54a9fc44808db1a8872e4%7C6d4fa94918de4214a28c3e8c7fa9c25b%7C0%7C0%7C638132945565032449%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=tUQWxNhMsx9MyR%2B1IzCz4h0v1WkQxmze9xKl5RAuSKE%3D&reserved=0>
   
[https://servicedesk.eurofunk.com/helplinePortal/content/images/eurofunk_xing.png]
 
<https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.xing.com%2Fcompanies%2Feurofunkkappachergmbh&data=05%7C01%7Cgmitterlechner%40eurofunk.com%7C4926be3c48a54a9fc44808db1a8872e4%7C6d4fa94918de4214a28c3e8c7fa9c25b%7C0%7C0%7C638132945565032449%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=P4%2FxMiblAm5sisfYhpDdzVhzC%2FImXrKgIN22jQJzeCU%3D&reserved=0>





Email secured by Check Point

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to