Isn't ip based hosts required for this as well?
>>> Joshua 12/01/05 11:56 AM >>>
On 12/1/05, Rob Benton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^my\.site [NC]
> RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^$
> RewriteCond %{SERVER_PORT} ^(80|443)$
> RewriteRule ^/(.*) https://my.site/$1 [L,R]
>
> That will direct all https:// traffic to the right hostname but trying
> to use http:// still results in the bad request error:
>
> "Your browser sent a request that this server could not understand.
> Reason: You're speaking plain HTTP to an SSL-enabled server port.
> Instead use the HTTPS scheme to access this URL, please."
>
> I must have missed something else in the config file. I have 2 Listen
> directives, 1 for 80, and 1 for 443.
You probably have SSL turned on for the entire server, rather than
just for the requests coming in on port 443. As I mentioned in an
earlier reply, you should have two vhosts: one for ssl on 443 and one
for non-ssl on 80. The second one just redirects to the first and the
SSLEngine directive is only in the first one.
Joshual.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
" from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message may contain confidential information, and is
intended only for the use of the individual(s) to whom it
is addressed.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
" from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
