On 10/31/07, Christian Folini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi there, > > I do not really understand your setup. Are you intending to say, > that you have two seperate apache instances, one serving via > mod_cache and the other one (in front) proxying requests > via mod_proxy_balancer?
Yes . Please be very clear with your setup. Then please provide > your apache versions and your full configuration files > for both supposed apache servers. Apache 2.2.6. I can't provide configs, but the Listen directives are correct. My question is whether Apache uses tcp connections for mod_cache to communicate with Apache. Thanks. Quick hint: Have a look at your "Listen" directive. > > regs, > > Christian > > On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 03:51:43PM +0100, Jack Tuckson wrote: > > Apache is doing something odd - can anyone help? > > > > I have are two Apache processes, one for mod_cache, one for > > mod_proxy_balancer. > > mod_proxy_balancer requests get passed to mod_cache. > > > > mod_cache listens on 192.168.100.123, mod_proxy_balancer has a separate > ip > > address. > > > > Everything works - but there are processes listening on 192.168.100.123for > > BOTH processes, making requests to a different port on that ip. > > > > Here is what netstat sees: > > > > local address -> foreign address > > > > mod_cache: > > 192.168.100.123:80 -> 192.168.100.123:34693 > > > > mod_proxy_balancer: > > 192.168.100.123:47992 -> 192.168.100.123:80 > > > > I wouldn't expect mod_proxy_balancer to be listening on mod_cache's ip, > and > > I wouldn't expect mod_cache to make a connection to its own ip on a high > > port. > > > > Does anyone have any ideas? > > > > TJ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. > See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
