On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 2:26 AM, André Warnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Eric Covener wrote: >> >> On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 8:15 PM, Chris Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> >>> So is this a bug (as it worked as I need it to in 1.3), or just an >>> incompatable change? [or a bug that's been fixed from 1.3?] >> >> IMO there's no reason both your rules shouldn't loop. >> > Is that the same as saying that there is a reason both rules should loop ?
Yes, it looks pretty silly quoted :) Appending the one-liner to 1.3 "loops" as expected by its definition -- it must as it would be a bug if /firedragon/ didn't get redirected to /firedragon/firedragon/ ad infinitum. -- Eric Covener [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
