At 08:23 -0800 1/4/09, Evan Platt wrote:
At 08:20 AM 1/4/2009, you wrote:
how did this get mixed in by Threadr with the Tomcat discussion?
My guess is the person who wanted to unsubscribe picked a message,
replied to it, then changed the subject to unsubscribe.
Right you are. These headers were in the first Unsubscribe message.
Message-ID: <c5837d95.29e09%[email protected]>
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
A quick search for the message-id in the Reply-to header comes up with;
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
In-Reply-To:
<1bca52cf5845e543b4b81aafef2afd7905f24...@lonsexc01.gta.travel.lcl>
Subject: Re: [us...@httpd] Isolating slow and fast connections using
apache/modjk
Not all mail clients handle the In-Reply-To: header the same way and
hardly any allow that chain to be exclusively used to keep threads
associated with each other. It's a shame because of the Re: [users.
.] AW: spelling corrections, and a bunch of other things that get
"helpfully" added to Subject: lines.
But it's good netiquette to start a new thread with a fresh "new
message". RFC-2822 is the place to start
--
--> A fair tax is one that you pay but I don't <--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
" from the digest: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
