Seems to me this whole rant got started because someone who appears to be well indoctrinated in the M$ world thought that Apache was somehow a lesser program because it did have a mechanism to support port sharing. That is a discussion for the developers thread and if you feel strongly about it, then you can devote your time to push that concept. As I see it, this is not a new concept. In the 2000's the buzz word is 'virtualization'....It depends on the design goals of the program as to what concept needs to be pushed. Sharing a port is yet another level of abstractions/indirection that most likely can decrease performance. (e.d. somthing M$ has not been overly concerned about, just look at Vista). There are also security issues (something else M$...well you get the picture). Am glad the OP solved the issue. -J
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Flowering Weeds <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > >> > > > > > > Call me crazy...but if apache were written in .NET, wouldn't that make > > > it a Windows-only product? > > > > > > > > > > > > No http.sys makes it Windows only > but so does WSA commands now! > > Anyway a lot of .NET (CLR really) is > in Mono and the many Silverlight .NET > usage versions for most OS browsers. > > Remember C# is a standard now > and .NET is Microsft's version of it! > > FYI > > > > ------------------------------ > Windows Live™: Keep your life in sync. Check it > out.<http://windowslive.com/explore?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_allup_1b_explore_032009> >
