We have the foundry switch which is being replaced by Netscaler now.So can we use Pound or LSV in this case ?
Mainly the Netscaler switch is going to handle the http request which later by passed to different backend server (linux boxes). Thanks in advance. Arnab On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Paul Miles <[email protected]> wrote: > LVS and pound act in different ways, and on different levels of the TCP > stack. > > > > It all depends what you're trying to achieve as to which is most suitable > for you. > > In our environment we use a failed over pair of hardware load balancers > which balance traffic across a pair of squid caching servers which then load > balance to a pair of pound servers. (see attachment) > > > > We use pound to send certain urls and virtual hosts off to a series of > backend java applications. > > > > This is probably off topic now though … > > > > Regards, > > > > Paul > > > > *---* > > *Paul Miles > *Systems and Infrastructure > > *Fax*: + 44 (0)8701 236 087 > *Web*: http://www.paymo.com > > [image: cid:[email protected]] > > *Paymo > *107 Fleet Street > London, EC4A 2AB > UK > > > > > > *From:* Arnab Ganguly [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* 22 June 2009 11:19 > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [us...@httpd] Apache as a Gateway > > > > Hi All, > How is LVS http://kb.linuxvirtualserver.org/wiki/Load_balancer compared to > Pound ?Which one would be better to use? > Thanks > Arnab > > On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 7:43 PM, Julien Gerhards < > [email protected]> wrote: > > Hi ! > > > > CentOS is 100% compatible with RHL ! > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. > See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > " from the digest: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >
<<image001.png>>
