Eric Covener wrote:
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Nick Kew<[email protected]> wrote:
Eric Covener wrote:
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 6:43 AM, Nick Kew<[email protected]> wrote:

You can compile mod_proxy_html against it with a simple #define.
See the comment in the source code, at about line 800 or 801
in the version that bombs out at 802.
FWIW I tried that -D and it still comlained about the three HTTP_* macros.

Huh?  HTTP_ macros?  Whare do they come from?

Doh, HTML_* (HTML_INVALID, HTML_DEPRECATED, HTML_REQUIRED)


Aha, I see.  They're new in mod_proxy_html 3.0, which is several
years later than the XML_ macros with the old-libxml2 support.

I guess it's time to declare very-old-libxml2 unsupported.

I also recollect there was a serious libxml2 bug that affected
mod_proxy_html and could cause it to spin and eat memory in
comment parsing.  It was fixed in IIRC libxml2-2.5.10,
so supporting earlier versions is really a Bad Thing.

Thanks for bringing that to my attention!
Guess I should release 3.1.  It's been ready and just
awaiting docs updates for a long time!

--
Nick Kew

---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
  "   from the digest: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to