On 12/4/09, Francis GALIEGUE <[email protected]> wrote: > The problem I have is with the & being systematically understood by > the right size of regexes to mean "the whole thing matched by the > matching left regex". While this is a common regex idiom in "basic" > regexes (sed acts this way for instance), it is not expected at all > from pcre (Perl doesn't know about &, and from what I've read about > pcre so far, pcre doesn't know about it either). Hence my puzzle.
I think Apache is simulating perls $&, and I think it's on purpose. Seems pretty unwise. -- Eric Covener [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] " from the digest: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
