On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Eric Covener <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I'm just saying the documentation of the new matching scheme is
>> deceptive, not that any code should be changed..
>
> Operative point I'm trying to make is that there should not be a new
> matching scheme -- at best only new doc that didn't get backported
> since it also dropped _default_ and NameVirtualHost which we're saying
> were basically unnecessary.

Completely agree.. In the end, my only point is that the example in
the doc is counter to
actual behavior, not proposing any code changes :)

A doc change would prevent 2.4 nu bee problems in future ..

Cheers
Brett

-- 
The only thing that interferes with my learning is my education.

Albert Einstein

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to