Hi Pratyoosh,

We faced same kind of issue. Chunking was not working with smaller files.
Please have a look at:

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50402

I had recompiled Mod_ssl with the patch and it started working.

Do you have the similar issue?

Thanks,
Anoop

On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 10:09 PM, Pratyoosh Sharma <
[email protected]> wrote:

>
> We are observing a very strange issue with Apache 2.2.14 serving as a
> transparent proxy to an application server using mod_proxy, when the
> application server sends chunked mode response****
>
> ** **
>
> Apache is listening over SSL & reverse proxying to the backend server
> HTTP, We have SSLProxyEngine & SSLEngine set as on ****
>
> things work well when the response is not chunked mode encoded, but Apache
> seems be broken when the backend sends gziped content over chunked mode
> transport****
>
> ** **
>
> Unfortunately we don't control the backend server to enforce HTTP 1.0 on
> it ****
>
> ** **
>
> [Fri Aug 03 12:18:27 2012] [debug] ssl_engine_io.c(1869): OpenSSL: I/O
> error, 5 bytes expected to read on BIO#ea68050 [mem: ea78430]****
>
> [Fri Aug 03 12:18:27 2012] [info] [client 10.30.90.36] (70007)The timeout
> specified has expired: SSL input filter read failed.****
>
> [Fri Aug 03 12:18:27 2012] [debug] ssl_engine_kernel.c(1893): OpenSSL:
> Write: SSL negotiation finished successfully****
>
> [Fri Aug 03 12:18:27 2012] [info] [client 10.30.90.36] Connection closed
> to child 88 with standard shutdown (server xxxxxxxxxx:9333)****
>
> [Fri Aug 03 12:18:28 2012] [debug] ssl_engine_io.c(1869): OpenSSL: I/O
> error, 5 bytes expected to read on BIO#ea9a720 [mem: ea590c0]****
>
> [Fri Aug 03 12:18:28 2012] [info] [client 10.30.90.36] (70007)The timeout
> specified has expired: SSL input filter read failed.****
>
> [Fri Aug 03 12:18:28 2012] [debug] ssl_engine_kernel.c(1893): OpenSSL:
> Write: SSL negotiation finished successfully****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> We have tried to upgrading to the latest release Apache 2.4 using OpenSSL
> 1.0.1 with no success, any thoughts on what might be wrong here****
>
>
>

Reply via email to