Daniel,

Thanks for the helpful reply.

After reading it I realized that I’m indeed compiling on a system that’s 
different than the runtime which led to my issue.

In my case, apache was compiled with latest CentOS with a newer openssl 
version. The runtime was an older version of CentOS with an older version of 
openssl. The RPM distribution (from which the compiled Apache came from) also 
didn’t specify the newer “Requires” version of openssl.



From: Daniel <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Reply-To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Thursday, February 5, 2015 at 1:17 PM
To: "<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [users@httpd] what's the minimum version of openssl required by 
2.2.29?


2015-02-05 18:42 GMT+01:00 Shane Witbeck 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>:
I recently upgraded apache from 2.2.27 to 2.2.29 and received the
following error on startup:

/usr/lib64/libcrypto.so.10: no version information available

After some searching, I determined that openssl needed to be upgraded.

On CentOS 6.1 (yes, I know it¹s old):

The previous version was: OpenSSL 1.0.0-fips 29 Mar 2010

After upgrading via Œyum install openssl¹, the new version is: OpenSSL
1.0.1e-fips 11 Feb 2013

This leads me to the question: What¹s the minimum version required by
Apache 2.2.29?



Thanks,
Shane


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
For additional commands, e-mail: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>


Hello

none!

You don't specify if you upgraded through your distribution, or compiled 
manually, in any case httpd will depend on openssl libraries to which it was 
compiled, if none were specified it should be using the libraries present in 
the system when you ran ./configure.

If you upgraded with a distribution upgrade it is hard to believe dependencies 
are not met or there are library versions mismatches.

It looks to me as if you are installing different packages from different 
sources.

So I believe it is better if you focus on meeting your distribution 
dependencies, or if you compiled manually with an external openssl version to 
add the /path/to/openssl/lib to your libpath or in envvars so httpd will find 
the appropiate openssl libraries

--
Daniel Ferradal
IT Specialist

email         [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
linkedin     
es.linkedin.com/in/danielferradal<http://es.linkedin.com/in/danielferradal>

Reply via email to