Hi Eric, I apologize for any confusion. To be precise, our deployment has several apache instances of different versions including 32-bit and 64-bit versions.
In one of the apache instance (2.2.3 version 64-bit) we got cache issue and you had confirmed that caches issues were fixed in 2.2.13 and suggested to use latest 2.2.29. In one of the other apache instances (2.2.11 version 32-bit) we don't see cache issue. So we would like to understand what version of apache 32-bit the cache issue were fixed? Thanks Mahendra. On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Eric Covener <cove...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 4:41 PM, mahendra babu <mahi.b...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks for the reply. You had confirmed that cache bugs was fixed in > 2.2.13 > > for 64-bit Apache version. We had another apache instance of 2.2.11 but > it > > is 32-bit. So the question is which Apache version fixed the mod_cache > issue > > in 32 bit apache , may be this issue was fixed in Apache 2.2.11 for 32 > bit. > > This email doesn't make any sense to me and I've got no idea what > yoour objective is. Before you asked about "all" mod_cache fixes. > If you're interested in what specific hopelessly out of date > maintenance level fixed an ancient bug, look at the changelog or view > the SVN history. > > If you want to run the oldest release with the fix, it's a bad idea. > If you want to confirm your hopelessly out of date httpd has a > specific bug, test on it and a recent release. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org > > -- Thanks, Mahendra. http://talkidentity.blogspot.com
