Who is reporting a 502 exactly? Perhaps we are missing the entire chain of events to properly diagnose the issue.
If the problem is a client reporting an issue while proxying to this server try manually to access ther web server yourself to discard issues: curl -vI https://www.amnetgroup.com also you can manually try: openssl s_client connect www.amnetgroup.com:443 and see if those tools report an issue. If the above works well, it may be client issue, some clients can not distinguish wildcard certificates. I know you said it is the same certificate name, etc but better recheck the whole chain of events, httpd knows how to match CN to wildcard certificates and like mentioned earlier, it usually is up to picky clients complaining about mismatches because they don't know how to deal with wildcard certificates (lots of java applications, for example). Also consider, if server has an issue with the certificate name it will mention it or fail silently unless debugging is enabled for ssl module. Briefly: * If httpd sees a difference between CN and ServerName, then there really is a difference, make sure the correct cert is installed. * If the wrong certificate (wrong name) is installed it will do the same as above. * If key and crt installed mistmatched it won't even start and fail silently. (so do make sure httpd is starting when you install the new certificate). * If the certificate is correct and client is complaining, it probably is a client which can't distinguish wildcard names, but this is not an issue, it is a client not prepared for wildcard certificates (java apps just need to specify a correct hostname verifier or no hostname verification at all). There isn't much more to this than what I described, so pay careful attention and make sure httpd starts. El lun., 6 ene. 2020 a las 14:32, Sac Isilia (<udaypratap.sing...@gmail.com>) escribió: > > Hi Martin, > > Below is the attribute of the existing working certificate. The only > difference is that the new certificate is of validity 2 years , but that > should not be an issue. > We performed below steps while updating - > > 1.openssl req -newkey rsa:2048 -nodes -keyout amnetgroup.com.key -out > amnetgroup.com.csr -- Generated the csr > 2. Send it to the concerned organization and got the updated PKCS#7 > certificate.(in the form of .p7b file) > 3. Extracted the certificate - openssl pkcs7 -inform der -print_certs -in > Amnetgroup.p7b -out amnetgroupnew.com.crt > 4. Updated the certificate content and the private key and the bundle file > was updated too that came along with it. > 5. Restarted the httpd service. And Alas!! website was throwing error that I > mentioned earlier. > > Certificate: > Data: > Version: 3 (0x2) > Serial Number: > 0b:1a:d3:af:3f:7d:ab:ea:7d:0a:b9:23:99:b1:bf:27 > Signature Algorithm: sha256WithRSAEncryption > Issuer: C=US, O=DigiCert Inc, OU=www.digicert.com, CN=RapidSSL RSA CA > 2018 > Validity > Not Before: Jan 23 00:00:00 2019 GMT > Not After : Jan 23 12:00:00 2020 GMT > Subject: CN=*.amnetgroup.com > > X509v3 Subject Alternative Name: > DNS:*.amnetgroup.com, DNS:amnetgroup.com > > Below is the attribute of the new certificate of which update is failing. > > Certificate: > Data: > Version: 3 (0x2) > Serial Number: > 0a:8f:61:f5:6f:8c:8b:ce:95:c2:d5:c5:79:8d:2b:d9 > Signature Algorithm: sha256WithRSAEncryption > Issuer: C=US, O=DigiCert Inc, OU=www.digicert.com, CN=RapidSSL RSA CA > 2018 > Validity > Not Before: Jan 3 00:00:00 2020 GMT > Not After : Mar 3 12:00:00 2022 GMT > Subject: CN=*.amnetgroup.com > > X509v3 Subject Alternative Name: > DNS:*.amnetgroup.com, DNS:amnetgroup.com > > Regards > Sachin Kumar > > > On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 6:34 PM Martin Drescher <dresc...@inter.net> wrote: >> >> Hi Sachin, >> >> as long as I am doing this, a non matching CN and/or v3 >> SubjectAlternativeNames never effected the HTTP server in a way, that it >> wpold stop working for me. Both messeges you quoted, ah02292 and ah01909 are >> warning messages. They *may* effect your client's behavior. Hence, if there >> is not a person in this list knowing better, this should not be of your >> concern. >> >> What about that 502? This looks like your real issue to me. >> >> However, I remember reading some stuff changed (or will change?) in regard >> of VirtualHost clause. But even this would not make sense, if your old >> certificate is still working. Next thing you could do is, look for changes >> int the certificate's attributes. May be there is a change, that should not >> be there. >> >> >> Am 04.01.20 um 18:02 schrieb Sac Isilia: >> > Hi Team, >> > >> >> [...] >> >> > *502 - Web server received an invalid response while acting as a gateway or >> > proxy server.* >> > >> > *There is a problem with the page you are looking for, and it cannot be >> > displayed.* >> > >> > *When the Web server (while acting as a gateway or proxy) contacted the >> > upstream content server, it received an invalid response from the content >> > server.”* >> > >> > In the error logs I have found below messages . >> > >> > ah02292: init: name-based ssl virtual hosts only work for clients with tls >> > server name indication support >> > >> > ah01909: rsa certificate configured for xxxxxxxxxxx:443 does not include an >> > id which matches the server name >> > >> > Please help me in resolving this issue. >> > >> > >> > Regards >> > >> > Sachin Kumar >> > >> >> >> >> Martin >> -- Daniel Ferradal HTTPD Project #httpd help at Freenode --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
