+1 for this. We will also archive all community activity on ASF infrastructure this way!
On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 7:14 AM Pratyaksh Sharma <pratyaks...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Rajesh, > > I do not have any strong opinions for/against point #1. > > Point #2 definitely seems useful to me. > I hope messages from #general channel will be formatted as respective > threads in either case - if the thread started on the same day or if some > reply comes on some ongoing thread. > > On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 10:48 PM Rajesh Mahindra <rmahin...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hi Folks, > > > > We are thinking of improving community communication, and here is a list > of > > things we propose to do (some of them are already available). > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/HUDI/Community+Communication > > > > While we have a few things proposed, we plan to prioritize the following > > two features to hopefully ease communication. We plan to extend the > current > > hudi bot (slack app) to implement the features. > > > > > > 1. As you are aware, we have 2 mailing lists: *dev* and *users*. To > make > > it easier for users to get these updates on a single platform (slack), > > we > > propose to enhance hudi-bot to mirror the emails from the 2 mailing > > lists > > and post them into respective slack channels (*#dev* and *#users*). > The > > sync will happen in near-real-time (a few mins). To ease readability, > an > > email thread will be synced as a single slack thread, i.e., the > replies > > on > > an email will be synced as replies on the slack channel to the > original > > post. > > 2. It is often hard to catch up on historical slack messages. To ease > > catching up on slack messages (*#general*) in the past few days, we > will > > further extend the functionality of the hudi bot to read all the slack > > messages of a day, format them, and send them as a single email digest > > to > > the *dev* mailing list. > > > > > > > > Please let us know what you think of this proposal, and feel free to > raise > > concerns if any. > > > > Thanks, > > Rajesh > > >
