% 
% > % an example of a worry is cache poisoning of an antique v4 bind.
% > % ----
% > % and there are thousands of vulnerable v4 binds still out there.
% > 
% >     One might argue that we have only applied the carrot.
% >     We still have broken/vulnerable code, some pushing
% >     15 years w/o an upgrade. Perhaps its time to apply
% >     a stick and let folks know that things will stop working
% >     or won't be the same unless they upgrade. 
% 
% there are people who don't think it's prudent engineering to break the net
% to get people to do something.  silly things about technical and social
% responsibility now that the net has grown a bit bigger than boys and their
% toys.
% 
% of course there are folk with the opposite opinion.

        And these folks tend to win operational/engineering arguments,
        otherwise we'd still be running:
        
        RIP, NCP, BGPv1, BGPv2, BGPv3, 
        Sometimes, you've got to cut the cord.

% 
% randy
% 


-- 
--bill

---------------------------------------------------------------------
The IPv6 Users Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe users" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to