--On Friday, October 04, 2002 04:03:53 PM -0700 Randy Bush
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> 1-use of BITLBL should be deprecated. This label has bit boundary.
>>> My questions are : How should we represent the reverse mapping
>>> without the bit label ? the boundary is still of bit?
>> Analog to RFC 2317
>
> 2317 was useful when there were 256 elements to be deployed. with
> just 16, why not just hack it in the zone?
IN case of delegation?
Peter
---
Dr. Peter Bieringer
mailto: pb at bieringer dot de
http://www.bieringer.de/pb/
Key 0x958F422D : B501 24F4 9418 23E2 C0F3 F833 7B57 AA7B 958F 422D
msg01332/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
