Sorry, the SNAP version I writed down it's wrong. I can't remeber the version right now, but I'll check it later. The important thing is that it is a release for FreeBSD 4.5.
Thanks, Nico > -----Mensaje original----- > De: De Le�n, Nicol�s > Enviado el: Viernes, 08 de Noviembre de 2002 09:11 a.m. > Para: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Asunto: Problems with NAT-PY implementation > > Hi, > > I'm having some troubles with the NAT-PT implementation. > I'm running FreeBSD 4.5 and I have installed the Kame SNAP release >kame-20021104-freebsd45-snap.tgz. With this, I have configured a NAT-PT router. Then >I have a DNS IPv6-native (toghether with anorther machines which have no relevance >hear). > > I have no problems when I do ping6 to any IPv4 machine (using the NAT-PT prefix), >neither to any IPv6 machine if I write down the address, not its name. > When I take a look at the tcpdump, it shows a "bad UDP cheksum", so even if our DNS >gets the answer for a name (the forwarder sends to it) it discards the packet. > I have a similar situation with TCP. I've tried telnet to the HTTP port and I get >the web page with "bad TCP cheksum", so it is discarded. > But the strange thing is that I have no problem when I do ping6 6to4.kfu.com. I get >the DNS answer and the ping6 works!. > Another thing I tried was dig @my_forwarder some_ipv4_machine_name A and it works, I >get the answer. And when I do the same query for a machine which has both A and AAAA >records, sometimes it works, but mostly doesn�t. > > So I'm a bit confused, because at first sight it looked like a transport layer >problem with the cheksum computation, but then I have no problem with some particular >address!. Sorry for the mail length, I tried to be clear with the problem. > > I'd appreciate if someone could help me. Thanks, > > Nico. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- The IPv6 Users Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe users" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
