On Friday 10 January 2003 04:17, Bound, Jim wrote: > So now your mail says it is ok to support DHCPv6 if it meets certain > requirements. In the mail that orginiated you said below: > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > --- > > >> However, you may have to note that the implementation does NOT > > support > > >> stateful address autoconfiguration via DHCPv6, NOR WILL. > > > > I don't know a lot about DHCPv6, but...why not ? > > Because we don't need it. > > See the BUGS section of > http://orange.kame.net/dev/cvsweb2.cgi/kame/kame/kame/dhcp6/dhcp6c.8?rev > =1.18&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup > > JINMEI, Tatuya > Communication Platform Lab. > Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba > Corp. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Not sure but we may have a communications problem. I and others that > forwarded me the mail believe you mean't you did not intend to do DHCPv6 > because "you don't need it".
Hi all: Worse than that, when I saw "NOR WILL", such a sentence made me feel afraid (and worried). IMHO, there's no need to continue this thread any longer. Now I think the point is clear. I would like to see full support for DHCPv6 in KAME repository (though I don't need it "yet") Thanks, and let's go to make IPv6 better than IPv4 ! -- JFRH --------------------------------------------------------------------- The IPv6 Users Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe users" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
