Fernando Gont wrote:
Hi,
I'm just about to write a brief explanation about the RRs that need to be added to the ones described in RFC 1034 / 1035, in order to add support for IPv6.
I've read RFC 3363, and it recommends that RFC 1886 stay on standards track and be advanced, and to move RFC 2874 to Experimental status.
Shall I make comments on AAAA records, and don't even mention A6 records?
You want to mention them, but mention that they've been shelved, cite the RFC that explains why :)
About address mapping, RFC 3152 says IP6.ARPA should be used, instead IP6.INT.
The same here: shall I omit the description of IP6.INT, or it is still being used, and so, I should describe it?
Describe it, and say 'don't use it, this is why it exists', or you'll get questions like "I've read this doco, but I've seen A6 records .. what are they for?" Carl --------------------------------------------------------------------- The IPv6 Users Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe users" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
