> Marc Vanbrabant wrote:
> I would say the follow (though consider me newbie):
> 193.109.122.62 = ::ffff:193.109.122.62/96;
No. First, you did not mention a subnet mask for the IPv4 address, but the only thing
that would match /96 would be /0 for v4, no go. What you should have written is:
193.109.122.62/32 = ::ffff:193.109.122.62/128
> If you want a subnet like:
> 193.109.122.62/29
This has never been a subnet. The network address for this IP and subnet mask is
193.109.122.56.
> that would be
> ::ffff:193.109.122.62/125;
Wrong. That would be ::ffff:193.109.122.56/125
> /125 from /96 + /29
This part is correct.
Michel.
_ ____ __ __ ____ _ _ _ _
Michel Py | | | _ \ \ \ / / / ___| | \ / | | | | |
Sr. Network Engineer | | | |_| | \ \ / / | |__ | \/ | | |__| |
CNE, MCSE, CNP | | | __/ \ \/ / | _ \ | \ / | | __ |
CCIE #6673 | | | | \ / | |_| | | |\/| | | | | |
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |_| |_| \/ \___/ |_| |_| |_| |_|
IPv6 Multihoming Solutions
http://arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us/ipv6mh
http://arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us/public/ipv6mh/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The IPv6 Users Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe users" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
