Michel Py wrote: > > Jeroen Massar wrote: > > Actually with IPv6 it's currently easier to use an ALLOW > > and not a deny section, they also are a bit shorter :) > > This is a very valid point but it does present challenges with route > servers. Could you come up with a route-map valid for ALLOW routes > received from the route server? > > For DENY routes it's easy: you set the next hop to an address that is > routed to null0.
No comment ;) Though, dear vendors, maybe it would be nice to have some kind of distribution method for filters, another use of this would be to quickly distribute a prefix which would need to be dropped (ddos etc). Then again, that would be a completely different project and would require quite some trust and security. > I will post shortly a statement of applicability for IPv6 bogon route > servers. That would be a nice addition indeed. Greets, Jeroen --------------------------------------------------------------------- The IPv6 Users Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe users" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
