Hi Tina > I don't suppose you'll get problems with either 6to4 and TRT or 6to4 and NAT-PT. But why should you want to use TRT and NAT-PT at the same time? Shoulnd't just one of those mechanisms be enough?
If you have a general scenario with IPv4 and IPv6 networks, and you want for example accede to an IPv4 ftp server via an IPv6 machine, you should use the TRT translator mechanism, but if you want to ping the IPv4 ftp server via an IPv4 machine you should use NATPT translation mechanism. I think that in this scenario you must run the both translation mechanisms. Regards ------------------------------------------ Ant�nio Manuel N. C. Amaral Networks and Multimedia Institute of Telecommunications - Aveiro P-3810-193 AVEIRO - PORTUGAL Phone: +351 234 377900 Fax: +351 234 377901 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------ -----Original Message----- From: Tina Strauf (JOIN Projekt Team) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: sexta-feira, 4 de Junho de 2004 8:57 To: Ant�nio Amaral Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 6to4, TRT and NATPT Hey Ant�nio, > Is it possible to use simultaneously 6to4, TRT and NATPT transition > mechanisms in the same freebsd (with Kame snapkit) machine? I don't suppose you'll get problems with either 6to4 and TRT or 6to4 and NAT-PT. But why should you want to use TRT and NAT-PT at the same time? Shoulnd't just one of those mechanisms be enough? regards, Tina -- JOIN - IP Version 6 in the WiN Tina Strauf A DFN project Westfaelische Wilhelms-Universitaet Muenster http://www.join.uni-muenster.de Zentrum fuer Informationsverarbeitung Team: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Roentgenstrasse 9-13 Priv: [EMAIL PROTECTED] D-48149 Muenster / Germany GPG-/PGP-Key-ID: 923F61D0 Fon: +49 251 83 31833, Fax: +49 251 83 31653 "Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one." Albert Einstein --------------------------------------------------------------------- The IPv6 Users Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe users" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
