Teredo is not a nightmare. But it does require coordinating functions and nodes externally. I am not advocating but I do not like to see folks declare any hardwork or ideas as nightmares at this point we have so little. Teredo spec documents its limitations as all mechanisms. It also permits one to punch through the firewall which can be dangerous without proper diligence.
/jim > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Mohacsi Janos > Sent: Friday, March 18, 2005 7:02 AM > To: Michael Banta > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: 2002 addresses > > > > > > On Thu, 17 Mar 2005, Michael Banta wrote: > > > Ok, things are starting to make a little more sense, thank you all. > > > > I was ready to assign an IP of 2002: to a windows xp client > when I realized > > that this machine is behind a firewall and has a nat'ed address of > > 10.0.10.x. I would not think that would be allowed. > > > > Is this a correct assumption? > > Yes. For 6to4 you need at least one global IPv4 address on > your router. > Behind NAT you might try to use Teredo nightmare.... > > Regards, > > Janos Mohacsi > Network Engineer, Research Associate > NIIF/HUNGARNET, HUNGARY > Key 00F9AF98: 8645 1312 D249 471B DBAE 21A2 9F52 0D1F 00F9 AF98 > > > > Thanks > > Mike > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > The IPv6 Users Mailing List > > Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe users" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > The IPv6 Users Mailing List > Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe users" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- The IPv6 Users Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe users" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
