Dear Mr. Bellino and IPv6 folks,
I am also working on passing Tahi, but for Phase 2. And I've had very
helpful replies from the Tahi group on issues about their tests and Perl
code.
What the rules of the tests are, will become an issue for us, so I am
interested in your thread.
My working interpretation of the rules is that all the data and timing
in the Perl code within a test are "official Tahi rules." I have
questioned the Tahi group about particular tests and gotten helpful and
reasoned replies, and still have outstanding questions about some tests.
It is reasonable to ask, as you have done, "does this test pass correct
results?" In one instance the Tahi reply was, "we will fix this problem
in a later version."
You could try sending this particular issue (4) to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have altered Tahi Perl code that affects the system between tests. My
assumption is that I can send in my ct/ directories with results that
have been run with pure Tahi and still pass, even if the delays between
tests were under my control and I communicated from the TN to the NUT to
signal neighbor cache purges. The timing of neighbor cache purges is
left open by the RFCs, but critical for passing the tests.
Tx,
Tim McFadden
--------------------------------------
Interniche Technologies, Inc.
51 East Campbell Avenue, Suite 160
Campbell, CA 95008
408-540-1160x207
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.iniche.com
--------------------------------------
Bellino, Phil wrote:
Hello,
I am executing the IPv6 Ready Logo Program Self test version 1.3.6. I have
accomplished the following:
1. The Ipv6 Specification tests all passed.
2. The ICMPv6 tests all passed.
3. The Neighbor Discovery tests all passed.
4. I have an issue with the Stateless-autoconf tests. There are 26 tests and
tests 1-23 all passed. Test 24-26 hang because one or the other "VSLEEP"
formulas end out with a negative value for seconds to wait(which causes the
hangs).
My questions are:
1. Has anyone seen this in testing?
2. Are we allowed to change the pearl scripts with respect to the vsleep
formulas to make them work as the comments read in the respective .seq
files? RA_sameVLT.seq for test 24, RA_incVLT.seq for test 25, and
RA_decVLT.seq for test 26.
3. Actually, I have done this, but isn't this also breaking the rules of
the tests?
Thanks,
Phil Bellino
============================
Phil Bellino
MRV Communications, Inc.
Boston Product Division
295 Foster St.
Littleton,MA 01460
Tel: (978)952-4807
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
============================
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The IPv6 Users Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe users" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
