When you say methods, I think you mean what Isis calls actions (as opposed
to the getter/setter methods that represent properties and collections).
If so, the yes.
Use the Identifier.Type enum to distinguish which sort of member
(property/collection/action) you are protecting.
Or, if you want more fine-grained control, use the regular disableXxx() for
each 'xxx' member, eg:
public String getFirstName() { ... }
public void setFirstName(String fn) { ... }
public String disableFirstName() { return owner()? null: "oh no you
don't!"; }
private boolean owner() { return
getCreatedBy().equals(container.getUserName());
Dan
On 15 October 2013 17:53, james agada <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks. If I had methods, will this also apply to them ie I have a method
> like "Process" that appears on the menu when the entity is shown. Can I use
> the same approach to disable it?
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Dan Haywood
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
> > something like:
> >
> > public class SomeClass {
> >
> > private String createdBy;
> > ...
> >
> > public String disabled(Identifier.Type type) {
> > return createdBy.equals(container.getUserName())? null: "Only the
> > creator can modify this object";
> > }
> > }
> >
> > HTH
> > Dan
> >
> >
> >
> > On 15 October 2013 17:01, james agada <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > I want to allow only the creator of a record to be the one able to do
> it.
> > > Any ideas?
> > >
> >
>
