+1, change Isis rather than Spiro. The learning curve (given you are a Java programmer) will be much shallower.
Also, if you can wait, I'll be enhancing the RO viewer in a couple of months to address these sorts of issues (when we start on our next-gen Angular-based viewer). Dan On 5 March 2014 18:54, Richard Pawson <[email protected]> wrote: > I doubt it would be easier - probably much more difficult. The formal > scheme is, by definition, more complex than the simple scheme - so I would > imagine it would be easier to add support for the Simple scheme to Isis > than to add support to the formal scheme to Spiro. And whereas Isis is > released and documented, Spiro is not yet released and documented. Also, > I'm afraid that neither Stef nor I would be willing - just at the moment - > to provide support for modifying Spiro in this way. We need to concentrate > resources on getting the first version out and some documentation written. > But if you got Isis to support the simple scheme and still hit problems > with Spiro we would, of course, help. > > -- > Reply to this email directly or view it on > GitHub<https://github.com/NakedObjectsGroup/spiro/issues/23#issuecomment-36778861> > . >
