On 5 April 2014 13:14, Chris Colman <[email protected]> wrote:

> How 'intense' do the UI capabilities get?


A good example - that Jeroen, one of our other committers, and I have been
working on (just went fully live a few weeks ago) is Estatio, at [1].

Unusually, though this was written for a commercial company, they've made
the software open source (for which we are very grateful).



> Like say you want to make a
> location selector with a drop down for each of:
>
> World Region
> Country
> State/Province
>
>
Then when you change selection in one of the top 2 drop downs the drop
> downs below repopulate to show content relative to the items selected
> above?
>
>
See [2].  And in general, do spend the time to explore our documentation [3]



> Is it possible to imply that kind of UI interaction from a model with a
> class diagram that looks something like:
>
> WorldRegion 1 -- * Country 1 -- * State
>
> ?
>
>
>
Currently the Wicket viewer only supports this for action parameters, not
for editable forms, so unfortunately not.  But what we find that for larger
domains, we tend to use actions much more than simple editing of objects,
so it's no great hardship.

Cheers
Dan


[1] https://github.com/estatio/estatio
[2]
http://isis.apache.org/how-tos/how-to-03-022-How-to-specify-dependent-choices-for-action-parameters.html
[3] http://isis.apache.org/documentation.html



>  >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Dan Haywood [mailto:[email protected]]
> >Sent: Saturday, 5 April 2014 11:09 PM
> >To: users
> >Subject: Re: ISIS concept
> >
> >Hi Chris,
> >welcome to the Isis mailing list.
> >Looking forward to hearing how you get on as you start playing with
> Isis.
> >Cheers
> >Dan
> >
> >
> >
> >On 5 April 2014 12:57, Chris Colman <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Wow! I just stumbled upon ISIS... it looks great. I am very much into
> >> domain driven apps and it's awesome that it uses my preferred ORM
> >> (Datanucleus) and my preferred Java UI framework (Wicket!).
> >>
> >> A collision of like minds!
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Chris
> >>
>

Reply via email to