>Excuse me for not being clear:

My problem is that the other properties of Person appear in columns after 
gender ("geslacht") although I have made annotations for them to appear before 
gender:

F.I.�

firstName() has @MemberOrder(sequence="10") but appears after 
getGenderForTables() that has @MemberOrder(sequence="55")

See [2]

I don't understand why this is ...



[2]

https://github.com/johandoornenbal/socrates/blob/master/dom/src/main/java/nl/socrates/dom/party/Person.java


Not sure I follow on this...

... the second property listed, getGenderForTables(), is annotated with
@Hidden(where=Where.OBJECT_FORMS), so it *is* going to appear in a table,
with a column name of "Geslacht".

Perhaps remove the two @Named annotations temporarily so you can
distinguish one property from the other?




On 2 September 2014 13:33,  wrote:

> > Still wrestling with ENUM: gender always appears in first column no
> matter what I do with MemberOrder.
>
> Any Idea?
>
>
>           private PersonGenderType gender;
>
>             @javax.jdo.annotations.Column(allowsNull = "false", length =
> JdoColumnLength.TYPE_ENUM)
>
>             @MemberOrder(sequence = "50")
>
>             @Named("Geslacht")
>
>             @Hidden(where=Where.ALL_TABLES)
>
>             public PersonGenderType getGender() {
>
>                 return gender;
>
>             }
>
>
>
>             @Hidden(where=Where.OBJECT_FORMS) // appears only in tables
>
>             @MemberOrder(sequence = "55")
>
>             @Named("Geslacht")
>
>             public PersonGenderType getGenderForTables() {
>
>                 return getGender();
>
>             }
>
>
>
>             public void setGender(final PersonGenderType gender) {
>
>                 this.gender = gender;
>
>             }
>
>
>
> There's a couple of tricks you can do to order columns in a table
> separately from as an object form.
>
> One technique is to use member groups to group on the object form.  The
> groups are then laid out in the order of @MemberGroupLayout.
>
> Meanwhile, (I'm pretty sure that) the columns of the table are laid out per
> @MemberOrder(sequence) without regard for the member group.  So with a bit
> of playing around you can get the columns to appear in a different order.
>
> The above technique has been all we've needed for Estatio.
>
> ~~~
> Alternatively, (more boilerplate but perhaps more maintainable) you can
> create derived properties and then hide the originals as required, eg:
>
> public class Customer {
>
>     @Hidden(where=ALL_TABLES) // appears only on object forms
>     @MemberOrder(sequence="1")
>     String getFirstName() { ... }
>
>     @MemberOrder(sequence="2")
>     String getLastName() { ... }
>
>     @Hidden(where=OBJECT_FORMS) // appears only in tables
>     @MemberOrder(sequence="3")
>     @Named("First name")
>     String getFirstNameInTables() { return getFirstName());
>
> }
>
> In an object form, you should see: firstName, lastName.
> In a table, you should see: lastName, firstName
>
> HTH
> Dan
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 2 September 2014 10:47,  wrote:
>
> > > Tnc Dan. I checked those already but somehow it is not clear to me how
> > to order columns within a table that represents a collection. (Without
> > altering the order of fields in the form using @MemberOrder). Is there a
> > way to do that?
> >
> >
> > statically via @MemberOrder and @MemberGroupLayout annotations, see [1]
> >
> > dynamically via .layout.json file: see [2]
> >
> > HTH
> > Dan
> >
> > [1] http://isis.apache.org/components/viewers/wicket/static-layouts.html
> > [2]
> http://isis.apache.org/components/viewers/wicket/dynamic-layouts.html
> >
> >
> >
> > On 2 September 2014 08:28,  wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > How can I order the columns (properties of an object) of an collection
> in
> > > the wicketviewer? I think Jeroen told me but I forgot, sorry.
> > >
> > > (I would like to know how to do it using JSON layout and/or
> Annotations)
> > >
> > > For example ordering all persons in my socrates app [1]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > [1] https://github.com/johandoornenbal/socrates
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>

        �

Reply via email to