The difference might be to do with the network. I always add the --offline flag (mvn clean install -o) to speed up build times.
On 3 January 2015 at 18:36, Branham, Jeremy [HR] < [email protected]> wrote: > > So either your machine is much slower or your changes made the build > slower ?! > > I suspect it's this enterprise laptop that's loaded down with services > [and streaming music =] > But I'll need to check if I left extra validations turned on during the > integration tests. > > > Jeremy D. Branham > Tel: **DOTNET > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Martin Grigorov [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2015 6:42 AM > To: users > Subject: Re: Removing the ObjectAdapter mappings > > Hi Jeremy, > > > On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 8:15 AM, Branham, Jeremy [HR] < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > So removing the HashMaps turned out to be more work then I'm ready for > > right now. [I threw that branch out] > > > > The good news is that the DN 4.x branch is now working. There were > > some 'instanceOf' checks for PersistenceCapable that I missed before. > > > > Now to use the latest Neo4j =] > > > > > > [INFO] Reactor Summary: > > [INFO] > > [INFO] Apache Isis Core .................................. SUCCESS > > [2.668s] [INFO] Isis Core Unit Test Support ....................... > > SUCCESS [7.635s] [INFO] Isis Core AppLib > > .................................. SUCCESS [10.587s] [INFO] Isis Core > > Log4j Impls ............................. SUCCESS [0.871s] [INFO] Isis > > Core MetaModel ............................... SUCCESS [42.513s] > > [INFO] Isis Core Runtime ................................. SUCCESS > > [13.920s] [INFO] Isis Core Wrapper Service ......................... > > SUCCESS [2.948s] [INFO] Isis Core WebServer > > ............................... SUCCESS [0.906s] [INFO] Isis Core > > (Bypass) Security ....................... SUCCESS [0.693s] [INFO] Isis > > Core Shiro Security .......................... SUCCESS [2.455s] [INFO] > > Isis Core Spec Support ............................ SUCCESS [0.911s] > > [INFO] Isis Core Integration Testing Support ............. SUCCESS > > [1.545s] [INFO] Isis Core RestfulObjects Viewer AppLib ............ > > SUCCESS [3.395s] [INFO] Isis Core RestfulObjects Viewer Rendering > > ......... SUCCESS [3.072s] [INFO] Isis Core RestfulObjects Viewer > > Server ............ SUCCESS [3.164s] [INFO] Isis Maven Plugin > > (isis-maven-plugin) ............. SUCCESS [4.312s] [INFO] Isis Wicket > > Viewer ................................ SUCCESS [0.230s] [INFO] Isis > > Wicket Viewer Applib ......................... SUCCESS [0.569s] [INFO] > > Isis Wicket Viewer Model .......................... SUCCESS [2.586s] > > [INFO] Isis Wicket Viewer UI Components .................. SUCCESS > > [20.864s] [INFO] Isis Wicket Viewer Implementation ................. > > SUCCESS [3.407s] [INFO] Isis TCK App > > ...................................... SUCCESS [0.174s] [INFO] Isis > > TCK DOM ...................................... SUCCESS [2.157s] [INFO] > > Isis TCK Fixtures ................................. SUCCESS [0.664s] > > [INFO] Isis TCK IntegTests ............................... SUCCESS > > [2.958s] [INFO] Isis RestfulObjects Viewer TCK tests .............. > > SUCCESS [6.109s] [INFO] Isis TCK Wicket Viewer tests > > ...................... SUCCESS [3.455s] [INFO] ToDo App > > .......................................... SUCCESS [0.089s] [INFO] > > ToDo App DOM ...................................... SUCCESS [3.398s] > > [INFO] ToDo App Fixtures ................................. SUCCESS > > [0.972s] [INFO] ToDo App Integration Tests ........................ > > SUCCESS [25.814s] [INFO] ToDo App Webapp > > ................................... SUCCESS [18.974s] [INFO] Simple > > App ........................................ SUCCESS [0.010s] [INFO] > > Simple App DOM .................................... SUCCESS [1.911s] > > [INFO] Simple App Fixtures ............................... SUCCESS > > [0.639s] [INFO] Simple App Integration Tests ...................... > > SUCCESS [8.050s] [INFO] Simple App Webapp > > ................................. SUCCESS [16.134s] [INFO] > > todoapp-archetype ................................. SUCCESS [20.689s] > > [INFO] simpleapp-archetype ............................... SUCCESS > > [6.850s] [INFO] Isis Scimpi Viewer ................................ > > SUCCESS [0.362s] [INFO] Isis Scimpi Viewer Dispatcher > > ..................... SUCCESS [10.513s] [INFO] Isis Scimpi Viewer > > Servlet ........................ SUCCESS [1.043s] [INFO] Apache Isis > > (Aggregator) .......................... SUCCESS [0.485s] [INFO] > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > -- > > [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS > > [INFO] > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > -- > > [INFO] Total time: 4:22.458s > > > > How long it takes to build Isis master branch at your machine ? > Here it takes 01:26min and my laptop is 2+ years old now. > So either your machine is much slower or your changes made the build > slower ?! > I guess it is the first but wanted to check. > > > > [INFO] Finished at: Fri Jan 02 00:11:45 CST 2015 [INFO] Final Memory: > > 130M/920M [INFO] > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > -- > > > > > > > > Jeremy D. Branham > > Tel: **DOTNET > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Branham, Jeremy [HR] > > Sent: Thursday, January 01, 2015 3:24 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: RE: Removing the ObjectAdapter mappings > > > > It looks like the FrameworkSynchronizer would still be important. > > I'm thinking the hashmaps would be removed from the AdapterManager, > > and calls for adapters would always create a new instance. > > Not sure about OID lookups yet. > > > > > > Jeremy D. Branham > > Tel: **DOTNET > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Branham, Jeremy [HR] > > Sent: Thursday, January 01, 2015 12:00 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Removing the ObjectAdapter mappings > > > > Suppose I wanted to remove the mapping between the pojo -> > > ObjectAdapter and from the OID -> ObjectAdapter, and just > > create/discard the ObjectAdapters when needed. > > > > What would be the high level steps to accomplish this? > > Would the FrameworkSynchronizer go away completely? > > > > It would probably be helpful if I used some sort of UML tool to > > generate a diagram of how the classes interact. I've stepped through > > most of the code but I forget the sequences quickly. > > > > Thanks! > > > > - Jeremy > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > This e-mail may contain Sprint proprietary information intended for > > the sole use of the recipient(s). Any use by others is prohibited. If > > you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and > > delete all copies of the message. > > > > ________________________________ > > > > This e-mail may contain Sprint proprietary information intended for > > the sole use of the recipient(s). Any use by others is prohibited. If > > you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and > > delete all copies of the message. > > > > ________________________________ > > > > This e-mail may contain Sprint proprietary information intended for > > the sole use of the recipient(s). Any use by others is prohibited. If > > you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and > > delete all copies of the message. > > > > ________________________________ > > This e-mail may contain Sprint proprietary information intended for the > sole use of the recipient(s). Any use by others is prohibited. If you are > not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies > of the message. >
