Hello Martin, > Please give us the diff and we will debug it.
Here it is: --- a/src/main/webapp/WEB-INF/logging.properties +++ b/src/main/webapp/WEB-INF/logging.properties @@ -19,8 +19,8 @@ # # Isis uses log4j is used to provide system logging # -log4j.rootCategory=INFO, Console -#log4j.rootCategory=DEBUG, Console,File +#log4j.rootCategory=INFO, Console +log4j.rootCategory=DEBUG, Console,File Thanks, Miguel > On Apr 9, 2015, at 9:42 AM, Martin Grigorov <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > What change exactly you did in logging.properties ? > Please give us the diff and we will debug it. > Thanks! > > Martin Grigorov > Freelancer, available for hire! > Wicket Training and Consulting > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov > > On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 5:57 AM, Luis Miguel Payet <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I create a new project from the SimpleApp archetype, version >> 1.9.0-SNAPSHOT. I change the logging to DEBUG in the logging.properties >> file. I test that the application runs properly. >> >> Then I add the isis-module-security add-on following the readme >> instructions. When I run the application, I get an exception as follows: >> >> 21:49:23,873 [IsisWicketApplication main ERROR] Failed to >> initialize >> com.google.inject.ProvisionException: Guice provision errors: >> >> 1) Error in custom provider, java.util.ConcurrentModificationException >> at >> org.apache.isis.core.runtime.runner.IsisInjectModule.provideIsisSystem(IsisInjectModule.java:132) >> at >> org.apache.isis.core.runtime.runner.IsisInjectModule.provideIsisSystem(IsisInjectModule.java:132) >> while locating org.apache.isis.core.runtime.system.IsisSystem >> for field at >> org.apache.isis.viewer.wicket.viewer.IsisWicketApplication.system(IsisWicketApplication.java:142) >> while locating domainapp.webapp.SimpleApplication >> >> When I turn the logging down to INFO, the application runs properly. The >> same behaviour happens with the SimpleApp version 1.8.0 >> >> Please help, as I’m far too new at this to be able to fix it myself. >> >> Thanks, >> Miguel
