ok, well good. Must admit I'd more or less forgotten about this way of defining permissions.
Dan On 10 June 2015 at 09:35, Erik de Hair <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 06/09/2015 02:30 PM, Dan Haywood wrote: > >> On 9 June 2015 at 13:17, Erik de Hair <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi, >>> >>> Does it matter in what order vetoing permissions are defined? >>> >> >> Are you talking about the isisaddons module security? If so, it's >> discussed in [1] >> > We're not using the isisaddon module (yet). I've got it working now. I > tried to veto one particular method and this didn't work but vetoing the > whole package (!reg/org.package:*) did. > > Thanks again, > Erik >
