Hi Dan, I wanted to ask whether you had the time to look into this.
If not, I would be willing to invest some time, but would need a bit of advice on how to tackle it. Thanks Kambiz On 2015-08-17 17:32 CEST, Dan Haywood <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Kambiz, > No, there isn't support at the moment. > > I would imagine it would probably take a couple of days to implement for > me, perhaps less. For someone less familiar with the code, perhaps double > that. > > Once I have 1.9.0 released (in the next week hopefully) I'll spend a couple > of evenings looking at it to see if I can "break the back of it" (eg that > you might finish it off if you really need the feature). > > Hope that sounds OK to you.. > > Cheers, Dan > On 17 Aug 2015 14:09, "Kambiz Darabi" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> is Isis capable of supporting the simple domain model as described in >> section 1.25.1 of the RO spec? >> >> I ask because of Richard Pawson's answer to my question on github: >> >> https://github.com/SpiroLibraries/Spiro.Modern/issues/2 >> >> > I'm afraid this is not going to be straightforward. Either Isis needs >> > to support the 'simple' domain model (my strong preference!), or Spiro >> > needs to be extended to work with the formal model (a lot of change - >> > and, inherently, much more complex than working with the simple >> > approach). I have suggested to Dan that in the next version of the RO >> > spec that the Simple domain model should be mandatory and the formal >> > one an optional extra. >> >> If there is no built-in support, I would be interested in an estimate of >> how much effort would be needed to implement that functionality. >> >> Thanks >> >> >> Kambiz >>
