Correct. I could see it might be doable if we extended the metamodel to specify the list of types to be rendered. Raise a ticket if you want it added to the backlog.
Thx Dan On 18 November 2015 at 19:39, Stephen Cameron <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I presume that it is not possible to display an unparented colllection of > types that all extend a common base type and for the collection to display > the extending type's icons and properties? Kind of like a UNION view in > SQL. > > Just confirming. > > Thanks >
