That sounds quite an impressive scale Erik, can you share any details? On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 7:28 PM, Erik de Hair <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On 12/06/2015 01:13 PM, Dan Haywood wrote: > >> Hi Willie, >> >> You're right, upgrading to DN 4.2 will break that service. >> >> Although we aim to preserve backwards compatibility between releases, this >> might be worth making an exception for; I doubt that many people use that >> API. And I understand that the JDOQLTypeQuery replacement is more >> functional. >> > I would only have to rewrite more than 200 queries :-( > > But I couldn't find any differences between JDO Typesafe Query and JDOQL > Typed Queries in the Datanucleus documentation. > > Erik > > >> As to whether there will be any complications in doing the upgrade, it's >> hard to anticipate. Generally upgrades have been relatively painless, >> even >> the move from DN 3.x to 4.x when quite a lot of DN was rearchitected. So >> my guess is that the move from DN 4.1 to 4.2 should be fairly >> straightforwad. >> >> I've raised ISIS-1276 [1] for this work, have scheduled for 1.12.0. But >> if >> you want to spike it on a branch to see if there are any issues for you, >> please do. >> >> Cheers >> Dan >> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-1276 >> >> >> On 4 December 2015 at 03:51, Willie Loyd Tandingan < >> [email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Hi! >>> >>> Would there be any complications updating DataNucleus to 4.2.0? According >>> to [1], They removed DataNucleus JDO Typesafe Query and replaced it with >>> JDO 3.2 JDOQLTypeQuery so I think IsisJdoSupport is one thing that needs >>> to >>> be updated. >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> [1] http://www.datanucleus.org/products/datanucleus/migration.html >>> >>> >
