I still don't think I understand what you're driving at here.
Why is a different "facade" prefix necessary? Can't this other property
just be a simple derived property?
@javax.jdo.annotation.NotPersisted
@Property(notPersisted=true)
public String getNameObject() { return getNameObject().getName(); }
??
On 25 August 2016 at 11:44, Stephen Cameron <[email protected]>
wrote:
> Thanks Dan, not so obvious!
>
> The reason for my hidden everywhere is to turn an object into a string in
> terms of display, but keep it as an object, which then relates to a
> separate table, which users can add records/objects to.
>
> There is a ticket ISIS-1180
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-1180> that relates to this,
> reading it now its not that clear my meaning, but (maybe to make it even
> less clear) I had the idea of 'property view models'. These could be
> assigned to a property via another naming convention, maybe facadeXxx()?
>
> e.g.
>
> public ObjectThatOnlyHasAName getNameObject(){
> return this.o;
> }
>
> public void setNameObject(ObjectThatOnlyHasAName o){
> this.o = o;
> }
>
> public String facadeNameObject(
> return this.o.getName();
> )
>
> another example could be to represent a String property as a hyperlink.
>
> public String getMyUrlString()
>
> public void setMyUrlString(String url)
>
> public URL facadeMyUrlString()
>
> Steve
>
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-1180>
>
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 5:52 PM, Dan Haywood <[email protected]
> >
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Steve,
> >
> > The issue is that the arrivingTransportType property below is marked as
> > being hidden="EVERYWHERE".
> >
> > How this works internally is that the <action>s at the top of a fieldset
> > end up being associated with the first <property> in that fieldset; in
> > other words its as if there was an @MemberOrder(named=... ) annotation on
> > the action. It also adds a facet equivalent to @ActionLayout(position):
> >
> >
> > @MemberOrder(named="arrivingTransportType")
> > @Action()
> > @ActionLayout(position = ActionLayout.Position.PANEL)
> > public Attend changeTransportTypes( ... )
> >
> >
> > Because the arrivingTransportTypes is hidden, this ends up hiding the
> > action.
> >
> >
> > The solution in your case would be to reorder the properties:
> >
> >
> > <ns2:fieldSet name="Transport"
> id="transport">
> > <ns2:action id="changeTransportTypes">
> > <ns2:property
> > id="arrivingTransportTypeName"
> > hidden="ALL_TABLES">
> > <ns2:named>Arriving</ns2:named>
> > </ns2:property>
> > <ns2:property
> > id="departingTransportTypeName"
> > hidden="ALL_TABLES">
> > <ns2:named>Departing</ns2:named>
> > </ns2:property>
> > <ns2:property id="arrivingTransportType"
> > hidden="EVERYWHERE" />
> > <ns2:property id="departingTransportType"
> > hidden="EVERYWHERE" />
> > </ns2:fieldSet>
> >
> >
> >
> > Hope that helps,
> > Dan
> >
> >
> >
> > On 25 August 2016 at 06:47, Stephen Cameron <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I have a problem with an xml layout, there is an action that I cannot
> get
> > > to appear in the panel of a fieldset. Its probably something that I
> have
> > > done, but I cannot see what after a lot of searching. Hopefully someone
> > > else's eyes may be better.
> > >
> > > The relevant section is as follows:
> > >
> > > <col span="6">
> > > <ns2:fieldSet name="Attended" id="attend">
> > > <ns2:action id="wasAttended" />
> > > <ns2:action id="wasNotAttended" />
> > > <ns2:property id="wasAttended" />
> > > </ns2:fieldSet>
> > > <ns2:fieldSet name="Times" id="times">
> > > <ns2:action id="updateDatesAndTimes" />
> > > <ns2:property id="startDateTime" />
> > > <ns2:property id="endDateTime" />
> > > <ns2:property id="attendanceInterval"
> />
> > > </ns2:fieldSet>
> > > <ns2:fieldSet name="Transport"
> > id="transport">
> > > <!-- ns2:action
> id="changeTransportTypes"
> > > /-->
> > > <ns2:property
> id="arrivingTransportType"
> > > hidden="EVERYWHERE" />
> > > <ns2:property
> id="departingTransportType"
> > > hidden="EVERYWHERE" />
> > > <ns2:property
> > > id="arrivingTransportTypeName"
> > > hidden="ALL_TABLES">
> > > <ns2:named>Arriving</ns2:named>
> > > </ns2:property>
> > > <ns2:property
> > > id="departingTransportTypeName"
> > > hidden="ALL_TABLES">
> > > <ns2:named>Departing</ns2:named>
> > > </ns2:property>
> > > </ns2:fieldSet>
> > > </col>
> > >
> > > The commented out action is the problematic one, when not commented out
> > it
> > > just fails to appear, when commented out I do see the action button at
> > the
> > > top row (due to the unreferencedActions attribute).
> > >
> > > If I download and check the normalised layout file I see the following
> in
> > > the top row, which proves I've got the action @id correct.
> > >
> > > <bs3:row>
> > > <bs3:col unreferencedActions="true" span="12">
> > > <cpt:domainObject/>
> > > <cpt:action id="changeTransportTypes"/>
> > > </bs3:col>
> > > </bs3:row>
> > >
> > > In contrast the 'updateDatesAndTimes' action in the previous fieldset
> > does
> > > appear.
> > >
> > > The actual method in the class is as follows.
> > >
> > > @Action()
> > > public Attend changeTransportTypes(
> > > @Parameter(optionality = Optionality.MANDATORY)
> > > @ParameterLayout(named = "Arriving Transport Type") String arriving,
> > > @Parameter(optionality = Optionality.MANDATORY)
> > > @ParameterLayout(named = "Departing Transport Type") String departing)
> {
> > > setArrivingTransportTypeName(arriving);
> > > setDepartingTransportTypeName(departing);
> > > return this;
> > > }
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> >
>
