On 4/19/06, Stefan Guggisberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hi felix, > > these topics have been discussed extensively in the dev list. > check out e.g. > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.jackrabbit.devel/6166/focus=6172
sorry, the correct pointer is: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.jackrabbit.devel/6166/focus=6166 more pointers: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-313 http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.jackrabbit.devel/5414/focus=5452 cheers stefan > > cheers > stefan > > On 4/19/06, Felix Satyaputra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > I've got a question about DbFileSystem and > > SimpleDbPersistenceManager. It seems that these two > > classes are holding on to the single db connection and > > the bunch of prepared statement initialised during > > startup (please correct me if I am wrong). > > > > Is there a reason behind this? If the database > > connection and prepared statements are pooled (using > > dbcp, for example), would it break any compatibility > > with the JCR specs? > > > > If using connection pool would not break JCR > > compatibility, isn't it better to just create > > connection and prepared statements on the go? We then > > can configure jdbc url and driver which points to > > pooled connection like dbcp and proxool. The db pool > > then can handle reusing connection and prepared > > statements. > > > > Any thoughts are appreciated. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Felix > > > > > > > > ___________________________________________________________ > > To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! > > Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com > > >
