On 5/19/06, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
On 5/19/06, Alexandru Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Making the story shorter, after we removed this "custom" Lucene
> version from the 3rd party jars, we have no longer see the problem
> (now there are almost 18 hours from that point).
Good to know that there was an explanation on the problem you were facing!
I recall other Lucene version issues people have ran into, so I think
I'll add an FAQ entry about this and we may want to consider adding
some defensive coding in Jackrabbit that attempts to determine the
Lucene version and warn about possible incompatibilities.
BR,
Jukka Zitting
--
Yukatan - http://yukatan.fi/ - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Software craftsmanship, JCR consulting, and Java development
This may be a good thing, but I am not sure it would have worked in
this particular case: the breaking version was a custom 1.4, so I
guess it would have been quite difficult to figure it out.
I really hope I haven't spoken too early :-).
./alex
--
.w( the_mindstorm )p.
