Petr is the initial problem still valid if you use the patched (JCR-448) 1.0.1 release?
./alex -- .w( the_mindstorm )p. On 5/31/06, Petr Pytelka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, I've created simplified, faster and less resource consuming example of problem. Only source code: http://217.11.254.42/download/Test3.java (7kb) Package with all libraries: http://217.11.254.42/download/index-problem.zip (5MB) Please could you anybody confirm if it is problem in Jackrabbit or in my usage of JackRabbit ? Thanks a lot. Petr Petr Pytelka wrote: > Hi Marcel, > I've tried to find out more about my issue but didn't succeed. > > There is small application which demonstrate the problem: > http://217.11.254.42/download/index-problem.zip > > Steps to reproduce: > > Prerequisites: > 1. This test is resource consuming - need computer with at least 512 MB, > better 1 GB > 2. Package contain all needed libs and also source code (10kb) - I was > not able to create smaller example - sorry for that. > > Test can be run using script "run-test" or "run-test.bat" - at the > beginning of each file is path to the Java. > > Whole test is trying to create 10000 nodes > - Phase 1: Create 20 nodes > - Phase 2: Query for last created 20 nodes > > Problem is that on faster machines this test fail around 3000-5000th > document - it is not possible to locate file. Query in repository is > based on the attribute values. > > Maybe that the problem is in my code.. I'll really appreciate if you can > look on it... > > Thanks, Petr > > > Marcel Reutegger wrote: >> Hi Petr, >> >> can you please provide the source code to your test case that allows >> us to reproduce the behaviour? Thanks >> >> regards >> marcel >> >> Petr Pytelka wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I'm testing performance of Jackrabbit and found one issue. >>> >>> Test case: >>> 1. Insert N items >>> 2. Search each of inserted items (using Query) >>> 3. Drop inserted item >>> >>> When N is lower then aprox.1000 items every thinks works fine. But when >>> N is higher then aprox. 1000 items Jackrabbit (Lucene) some how "lost" >>> indexes and I'm not able to find required item (usualy I'm able to find >>> first 300 items). >>> If I delete index directory and re-run search, Jackrabbit build new >>> indexes during startup and I'm able to find all items. >>> >>> Lucene: version 1.4.3 >>> DB-backend: Derby >>> >>> Any idea where can be problem ? >>> >>> Thanks a lot, Petr Pytelka >>> >>> >>> >>>
