Hi If it has to support *read and write access* for multiple users, does this mean that a new session has to be created for each user?
Thanks Chandu -----Original Message----- From: Stefan Guggisberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 12:57 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Newbie Question - Performance On 6/28/06, Vijay Pandey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I am planning to use Jackrabbit and for a great # of users we only need to > provide read only access and i was reading on the wiki section abvout > performance, it says that > --------------------------------------------------------------- > it's a good practice to share a single anonymous session for read only > access if possible, it would reduce the time that write actions will take. > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Does it mean to say that 'session' is thread safe at method level for read > only operations , or do we have to synchronize the call on session? or do > you think should we have a pool of read only sessions ? you can assume that Session (at least the jackrabbit implementation) is thread-safe if it is used for *reading only*. cheers stefan > > Thanks > Vijay > > The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. This message is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited.
