On 9/20/06, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
On 9/20/06, Alexandru Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think this was caused by an OutOfMemory exception. By configuring
> the JVM to use 256M it seems I am getting some similar results.
>
> But my question is: why is this happening (and why would it be normal)?
What are you referring to, the ItemNotFoundException?
No, to the performance penalty. I mean, if you have a couple of
concurrent accesses to a RDBMS you will hardly notice that. Or am I
doing a wrong comparison?
./alex
--
.w( the_mindstorm )p.
BR,
Jukka Zitting
--
Yukatan - http://yukatan.fi/ - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Software craftsmanship, JCR consulting, and Java development
