so the "name" of a node is not part of its own state but the state of its parent?
Tobias Bocanegra wrote: > > you would need to restore /a/b/c/d since a move modifies the state of > the parent(s). > > regards, toby > > On 10/17/06, JavaJ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Say you have a Node F at: /A/B/D/F with version 1.0, then you decide to >> move >> it to /A/B/D/E (basically renaming it to "E") and version it 1.1. What >> happens if you restore the Node to version 1.0? Will it's name be "F" or >> "E"? >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/Restoring-a-node-after-move-tf2456196.html#a6846023 >> Sent from the Jackrabbit - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> > > > -- > -----------------------------------------< [EMAIL PROTECTED] >--- > Tobias Bocanegra, Day Management AG, Barfuesserplatz 6, CH - 4001 Basel > T +41 61 226 98 98, F +41 61 226 98 97 > -----------------------------------------------< http://www.day.com >--- > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Restoring-a-node-after-move-tf2456196.html#a6858943 Sent from the Jackrabbit - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
