Hi Dominique, "Isn't this what you are looking for?" Yes exactly. I'll try it out over the coming days and provide feedback. Regards, Shaun.
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dominique Pfister Sent: 03 January 2007 15:39 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Is anyone using MySql for persistence On 1/3/07, Shaun Barriball <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Dominique et al, > Thanks for the response. > My high level goal is to deploy a JackRabbit-based solution without a > single point of failure. A secondary goal is to be able to scale a > system horizontally with more instances. Both common requirements. I > was hoping that we could leverage the mature and bullet-proof > replication solutions provided by MySql or Oracle. Please correct me, if I misunderstood your statement. The JCR-623 solution has NO single point of failure: there is no central server delivering events to all interested parties, but every instance actively polls for changes made my some other instance. Setting up a new instance in the cluster is a matter of copying an existing instance's configuration and starting it up: it will automatically sync to the latest revision. And, of course, replicated MySql or Oracle databases can be used on the persistence layer. Isn't this what you are looking for? Kind regards Dominique ___________________________________________________________ Inbox full of spam? Get leading spam protection and 1GB storage with All New Yahoo! Mail. http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html
