Thanks a lot for this draft! I'll take a good look into that :). Best regards Edyta
> -----Original Message----- > From: Angela Schreiber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 8 stycznia 2007 12:18 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: UNLOCK with 'abort' transaction status don't abort the > transaction > > hi > > please note, that the 'local' scope only informs the > server, that any subsequent modification flaged with the > locktoken return by this special LOCK request must > be treated as transient modification. Session.save() or > Item.save() will be called upon the UNLOCK only. > > see the corresponding docu draft at > > http://www.day.com/jsr170/server/JCR_Webdav_Protocol.zip > > real transaction is not supported anyway at the moment, > since it has been decided once, that dependency to > jackrabbit-core should be present in the jcr-server. the > corresponding code therefore was commented. > > regards > angela The contents of this e-mail are intended for the named addressee only. It contains information that may be confidential. Unless you are the named addressee or an authorized designee, you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you received it in error please notify us immediately and then destroy it.
