Hi, On 2/22/07, Michael Neale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Stephan - isn't this needed so JCR transactions can participate in a wide JTA transaction? I find the suggestion otherwise quite alarming !
Jackrabbit explicitly manages it's part of a distributed transaction, and having the underlying database connection externally managed actually breaks the transaction support within Jackrabbit. BR, Jukka Zitting
