right - so I can switch logging implementations by just choosing them - cool.
On 4/24/07, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, On 4/24/07, Michael Neale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I may be jumping the gun, but I just tried upgrading to 1.3, and it doesn't > include Log4j or SL4j in the dependencies, yet this is needed (at least) by > TransientRepository - an oversight or am I doing something wrong? We've upgraded to a more recent SLF4J version that is split to separate api and implementation dependencies. The slf4j-api dependency is in the compile scope, but the log4j binding, slf4j-log4j12, is not. The idea is that we don't want to default everyone to use log4j, and that users should select which binding they want to use. BR, Jukka Zitting
