Thanks a lot, I misunderstood the '*' for any name. Regards, kalyan
Stefan Guggisberg wrote: > > hi kalyan > > On 5/10/07, Kalyan Sarkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> May sound stupid, but is there a way to define a nodetype that can have >> any >> no. of child nodes? > > just specify '*' as the name in the child node definition. > nt:unstructered is an example > for a such a node type. > > cheers > stefan > >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/Any-number-of-child-nodes--tf3722026.html#a10414651 >> Sent from the Jackrabbit - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Any-number-of-child-nodes--tf3722026.html#a10426412 Sent from the Jackrabbit - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
