Hi, On 5/25/07, Nick Stolwijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
However, we also want to use a database pool instead of the one connection Jackrabbit uses. For this I'm looking into a one connection per session. Are there any known drawbacks in that scenario? Would this be a patch the jackrabbit community would be interested in?
The current persistence managers assume a long-lived database connection, preferably one that covers the lifetime of the repository. See [1] and [2] for previous threads on this subject. If you're interested in working on this, see [3] for some draft code. [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.jackrabbit.devel/6166 [2] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.jackrabbit.user/2440 [3] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.jackrabbit.user/2436/focus=2552 BR, Jukka Zitting
